My views on blockchain / bitcoin

Going from abstract to concrete:

  • Private currency: good. I would love to have lots of them, just as I love both gold and silver.
  • Blockchain: not so good, more of a solution in search of a problem. The only advantage it has compared to an append-only database is decentralization… and I don't see a need for that. I would much rather have many private currencies. Also, in practice most coins are actually centralized, or at least a very small oligarchy.
  • Bitcoin: nah. Really bad. Incredibly slow to initialize, slow transactions, easy to control by a sustained state-level effort, very low cap on number of transactions per second, plenty of bugs, hard-forks which means the code is actually controlled by a small group (which in turn means that I can't trust that the currency itself is decentralized)… nah.

In conclusion, I like the initiative, and I'm 100% behind the idea that we need to separate states and money, but we're nowhere near yet.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Bitcoin was a great proof of concept, but the next gen of cryptocurrencies need to be better, more transactions per second and more privacy. What do you think of grincoin?
7:54 PM
Marcel said…
Grin looks interesting on a superficial read; it remains to be seen how practical and useful it will be in reality.
8:09 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Posting dynamic Master / Detail forms with Knockout

Image
I have the following dynamic form in my GitHub Inventory project : I created the form with KnockoutJS , using some ideas from this article . The detail view looks like this: <table id="acquisition_items" class="jtable"> <thead> <tr> <th>Product Name</th> <th>Quantity</th> <th>Price</th> <th>Value</th> <th><button data-bind="click: addItem">[+]</button></th> </tr> </thead> <tbody data-bind="foreach: items"> <tr> <td> <input data-bind="value: ProductName" type="text" value="" /> </td> <td> <input data-bind="value: Quantity" type="text" value="" /> </td> <td> ...
Read more

Comparing Excel files, take two

Image
I already wrote this project once, on GitHub , but I can't say that I like the result. I wrote that code without TDD, mostly to see if I can still work in the "normal" fashion. I can, but I had a bug that took me a while to even discover and then was difficult to write tests for. I also hate the temporal dependency in that design (if you don't call the SortBy method first, the ExcludeRecords method will return incorrect results). Anyway; here's attempt number two, writing that code using TDD. Structure I start by creating my usual structure for projects of this type - a library for the logic, a console application for the main program and a test project for tests. I also use the Enable NuGet Package Restore option (right-click on the solution node) to add the three NuGet files that will allow someone to automatically download all the packages I'm referencing without wasting space in the source code repository. (Right now I've only added the Moq pa...
Read more

EF Code First: seeding with foreign keys

This is just a quick tip, more for future reference for myself than anything else. When using Entity Framework Code First, one of the things you might want to do while developing the application is to seed your database with some test data. This can be something as easy as: protected override void Seed(InventoryDB context) { context.Products.AddOrUpdate( p => p.Name, new Product { Name = "Hammer", SalePrice = 11.99m, }, new Product { Name = "Nail Pack x100", SalePrice = 0.05m, }, new Product { Name = "Saw", SalePrice = 19.99m, }, new Product { Name = "Toolkit", SalePrice = 39.99m, } ); //... } (I am using the AddOrUpdate method so the code detects whether those products already exist and doesn't add them again if they do.) The Product class is quite simple and – most importantly – doesn't depend on any other: public class Product { public int Id { g...
Read more